technology

Tweens and Tech

My daughter recently passed her tenth birthday. 

Welcome to the Tweens!

There are, certainly, some timeless elements of raising a tween. The moodiness, the acting like a sassy teen one moment followed by curling up into a ball bawling over a broken toy. 

And the body odor, which they are only occasionally aware of, and almost never inclined to do anything about.

However, there are additional aspects of raising a kid here in the 2020s that aren’t quite immortal. Back in the 1980s, my mother never had to worry about me messing up her Netflix queue.

In a nutshell, kids need to have tech available to them these days. But kids are also too young to sign up for their own accounts on a lot of said tech. Sure, we can lie on some things, but not as many as you might think. 

Which means we have to sign them in as us. Which… kinda defeats the purpose of not allowing kids to sign up for their own stuff?

We ran into this issue on our recent cruise. Kids under thirteen couldn’t have their own log in on the cruise’s app, so we had to sign her in as me. But I was also signed in as me, so while she or I could text Wife, we couldn’t text each other. 

In addition, the cruise had an area set up for young kids, and it had activities set up for teenagers. For tweens, it had… the ability to check themselves in and out of the kids area. 

I guess they’re called Tweens for more reasons than one. They’re the Taint of childhood. And they smell like it, too.

I mean, you’ve got to be eighteen to enter into a binding contract, right? So thirteen shouldn’t make much difference from ten. If she violates those all-important terms and conditions, they ain’t coming after her whether she’s nine or thirteen or seventeen. 

I’ve known we’re in that Brave New World for a few years. One time I took Daughter to curling. She throws two or three shots then decides she wants a corn dog. I was about to give her a twenty when I remembered they don’t accept cash there. 

I gave her my card, because it’s not like anyone requires signatures anymore. It’s basically the same as when our parents wrote letters saying the liquor store could sell us beer because it was for them. (The 1970s were real, folks!)

I think I might’ve suffered twenty heart attacks in the five minutes she was getting her corn dog. Because Daughter ain’t the best at holding onto things. If I had given her a $20 bill and she set down the change somewhere and walked away, I’m out maybe $15. If she does the same with my debit card, I’m becoming besties with a Nigerian prince 

Last summer, we went to a baseball game in Colorado and were faced with a similar problem. She wanted water. Since there was no way we were letting her to weave in and out of a stadium crowd with our plastic, I went to get her stupid fucking water. What happened while I was standing in line? The Angels hit back-to-back-to-back home runs!

We got her Greenlight, which is basically a debit card that we can pay her chore money into. Anyone who raised a child before 2010 thinks we’re crazy to get plastic for our child, but think long and hard about how little you spend cash.

We still won’t let her go out with it. At some point, she’s going to need to carry it on her own. Keys, too. But she’s not there yet.

When she saves up for something, we give her the card to make that one purchase, then it stays with us. Half the time, we pay for it, then transfer the money back to us. Just like Venmo, which I just checked and, magically, it has a minimum age of thirteen. And since it’s tied to bank accounts and email addresses, it’s not like we can lie about her age, then readjust it in three years. 

I dropped her off for a birthday party at Round Table recently. Here’s one of those time-honored Tween Parent traditions. Most events, you have to play wait-and-see to figure out if it’s a drop-off or a parent-stay event. I would’ve been the only parent staying, aside from the birthday girl’s, so I left.  

Then I remembered she probably needed money, so I stopped by an ATM because I didn’t have any on me. It was for air hockey and the claw machine and such so, even if she took her Greenlight card, it wouldn’t have been useful. I showed back up ten minutes later to give her cash. Then she asked if I could go get change for it, because she didn’t want to have to engage with the cashier.

Ah, Tweens. The activities and opportunities have expanded, but the responsibility has not.

Again, most of these situations would’ve been the same when my parents was raising me during the Reagan administration. Sure, they might not have needed to break a twenty, or to get a fresh twenty, just to get some quarters for video games, but they would’ve gone to get water for me at the ballgame. Or, more likely, a soda because I don’t think they sold bottled water back then. 

The big change is in the technology space. Everything requires apps or accounts that the Tweens cannot own. 

For the second summer in a row, I’ve made Daughter sign up for our library’s summer reading program. Unlike back in ye olden days, when we just totally lied and turned in a piece of paper with a bunch of “Read 30 minutes” boxes checked, it’s now in an app that tracks the minutes. Of course, there’ still no proof she actually is reading between the two times she pushes the button, but at least it provides a much more accurate time count.

The summer program must be tied to a library card. So last year, and again this year, I just signed in as myself and changed the name to her. No biggie, because it’s not like I needed some stupid external motivation to ensure I do some reading. 

Hold on, let me go check the Kindle Summer challenge. 

This year, they turned the quest into a Dungeons & Dragons-ish quest, where you pick a wizard or a faerie or whatnot and the tokens you get for each task are tied to the character. And once you finish one quest, you can restart as another character. Sounds fun.

The parents can play along, too, the hobbit-looking, Brandon-Sanderson-sounding librarian says. That’s not an insult. If I told him he sounded like Brandon Sanderson, he’d probably spontaneously orgasm.

But… she’s on my account. Can I make two people on the same account simultaneously? No. One person per account. So Wife can play along or I can play along, but we can’t have a family-wide competition. Same damn issue as the cruise.

And again, I don;t see the difference between ten and thirteen. If she loses a library book at any point in the next eight years, they ain’t coming after her regardless of the name on the card. 

It finally came to a head when we got new phones. Daughter’s had a hand-me-down for a couple years now. For the majority of that time, she only used it to download mindless games, but over the past year, more of her friends are getting their own phones, so they text each other. Mainly emojis and whatnot. As far as I can tell, most developmental professional types are saying phones are fine for ten-year-olds, social media is not. Hell, social media probably isn’t a good idea for adults, either. As fun as it is to learn how vapid your favorite celebrity is, a world in which we mostly interact with people who we know and understand might not be a bad prescription.

They still aren’t allowed to have phones at school, but she’s heading into her last year of elementary school, after which I’m sure it will be game over. I keep seeing debates about whether phones should be allowed in schools. L.A. Unified just banned them and Herr Kommandant Newsom thought that sounded like a peachy idea for the whole state so he can run more commercials in Florida about how California believes in freedom. 

Kind of an odd battle to be fighting right now. My district is under the impression it’s illegal for us to ban phones, although I can’t find any court cases to that effect. Guessing there’ll be one the first day L.A. Unified actually tries to implement it. Something about the right to communicate. Besides, if schools are giving laptops to every student, taking away their phone isn’t going to create some utopia where they’re all paying attention. I’ve got students watching unedited Game of Thrones episodes, what the hell do I care if he’s texting someone?

Y’know, we used to pass notes in class, too.

So with middle school coming and any number of other reasons, when Wife and I recently upgraded our own phones, we finally brought Daughter’s into this decade. For the most part, it’s been a success. It’s great for car trips and providing some peace and quiet around the house, because I swear if I have to watch another season of Jesse, I might be committed.

She can also start doing front-end negotiations on play dates so the extent of our social secretarying is getting confirmation from the other child’s parents. You’d be surprised how often they have no idea their own child auctioned off their pool and half their refrigerator.

But there’s some snafus, Unlike the library, where she’s using my account, the Amazon account on Daughter’s phone belongs to Wife. You might’ve had heart palpitations knowing a ten-year-old can go hog-wild on Amazon with no guardrails, but Daughter is either a good soul or not very adventurous. I’m sure that will change at some point and we’ll have to lock it down. Maybe give her her own Amazon account and tie it to her Greenlight card. Except, again, there’s probably some legality behind doing that before she’s thirteen or maybe sixteen. I guess we could remove our own plastic from Amazon and have to enter it fresh each time, but Jesus, who wants to do that? Can you even have a pay-as-you-go Amazon account?

But for now, she uses Amazon responsibly. More responsibly than her parents. Yeah, I know I have ten unread books on my Kindle, I’ve just gotta get that other one. They’re offering double Kindle points this weekend! I have no idea what Kindle points are for, but it’s double! 

Daughter, on the other hand, makes wishlists for her birthday and looks for gift ideas for the two of us, even if we’ll be the ones buying it. That goes back as long as there’ve been gifting occasions. I remember picking out things at K-mart get grandma for Christmas, but I sure as shit didn’t pay for them myself. I only had to wrap them, so she’d know it was truly from me.  

Now, what Daughter should have done when she found the perfect gift for Wife was to text it to me. Instead, she put it in the cart. Makes sense, because that’s what she’s done when finding something she wants for herself. We tell her to look up lunchboxes or some Taylor Swift bullshit. She finds the item she wants and puts it in the cart. Then the next time we’re ordering toilet paper or toothpaste (but not Kindle books, because those are, of course, one-click buys), her item is sitting in our cart and we can decide whether to add it or save it for later.

Same way it worked at K-mart in 1985.

So she saw a shirt that she thought would be great for her mom’s birthday. And she put it in the cart. Of her mom’s Amazon account. 

Then, when Wife said she was going to order something from Amazon, Daughter piped up with that eternal cry of the Tween and beyond: “Don’t look in there!”

There’s got to be a better way.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got to send some account info to my Nigerian friend. He swears he’s going to send me some tasteful nudes of Queen Victoria.

As Hip as Vinyl

One of my favorite things about teaching economics is how approachable it is.

Never understood why most states wait until senior year to broach a system that most five-year-olds can figure out. You have a finite amount of money (or resources) and, as a result, you gotta choose what to use it for. How hard is that?

We’ve all experienced economics our whole life. For instance, most people are willing to pay more for things with utility, or usefulness, and convenience. Products that are less useful or convenient must be sold at a lower price or else consumers will substitute in the better…

I’m sorry, how much does that record player cost?

That’s, like, just a regular record player, right? The kind we were all too eager to move on from in the 1980s when snazzy new cassette technology came out?

It must be able to skip songs like CDs. Or flip the record over by itself? Oh, I’m sure it’s one of those faux items, made to look like it plays vinyl while in reality, you plug in a flash drive with MP3s.

No? it just plays vinyl records?

Sorry, where was I? Oh right, how intuitive economics is.

When most people hear “social science,” they think history, but when you actually think about the wording, it’s the study (“science”) of human interaction (“social”). And there is no more basic human interaction than “You make a product I want. This is how much I’m willing to pay for it.”

Like, for instance, you produce a record player. If this were 1970.

You see, the law of demand says that people want to pay as little as possible for a product. Unless it’s got the hipster badge of honor, evidently. And the law of supply says… well, I guess the law of supply is in full force here, because if dumbasses are willing to pay more for decades-old technology that’s been replaced by at least three generations of improved products, then sure, I’ll make as many of those damn things as you want.

Actually, there is one economic concept that helps explain the price of record players, which is a decrease in supply. As most companies move on to produce newer, better technology, there are only a few record players being produced. The small number of customers remaining are willing to pay more for the few remaining relics of the past. Maybe there are some warmed over hippies who want to play the vinyl collecting dust on the shelf for the entirety of this millennium. 

I can commiserate. I’ve got a crap-ton of VHS tapes that I’ll never get to watch again. Sure, I’ve repurchased the movies, but dammit, Daughter needs to understand that it wasn’t Hayden fucking Christensen under Darth Vader’s fucking helmet. In fact, when I showed her Star Wars the few scenes she tuned out to were the digital scenes added in the 1990s re-releases, which look so phony now. 

Star Wars aside, most of my VHS tapes are recordings of community theater shows and a couple high school projects I made with Rian Johnson that I could probably sell for a premium. Actually, scratch that, they’re terrible. The only person willing to pay me for them would be hush money from Rian himself. 

Pretty sure I own “WarGames” in at least three formats. Even though I swap most of the movies I show in class in and out of the rotation every few years when I get tired of watching them, “WarGames” has never fallen by the wayside. It’s still, in my mind, the definitive Cold War movie that is still approachable to students today. If anything, it’s become even more relevantthe last couple years with the debates over AI. As such, I know I at least have it on VHS and DVD, and probably BluRay (which I always seem to forget is different than DVD). I’ve also purchased it digitally on Amazon one year when my DVD player wasn’t working, because now that DVD players only cost $20, the planned obsolescence on them is about two weeks. 

Yes, I understand the irony of discussing planned obsolescence in the same post as $300 record players.

A decade or so ago, I hoped the, with digital, we could get beyond repurchasing the same title multiple times, but now we’re getting into the “must purchase on different platforms.” I thought I was being proactive when I burned all the good songs off my CDs back in the mid 2000s. Except I burned them via iTunes and now have an android. And now my laptop doesn’t have a CD drive to reburn them.

To say nothing of streaming companies pulling content they already own off their own platforms. At first, I was annoyed I’d bought all those early MCU titles on DVD when they were all now available on Disney+. But at some point, they’ll pull a Mysterious Benedict Society on the MCU and I’ll be happy I have those DVDs.

Assuming I can find a DVD player when that happens.

So yeah, I get the idea of producing a few bits of obsolete technology for those still stuck in yesteryear. 

But vinyl records are still being produced. By new bands. And they cost TWICE AS MUCH as a goddamn CD. 

I discovered all this after Daughter discovered Taylor Swift. She’s ten years old, which is the proper age for a Swifite. Unfortunately, there seem to be a handful of people over the age of twelve who are ruining the situation for the rest of us, meaning Taylor Swift concert tickets are a wee bit more expensive than Kidz Bop.

Following Taylor Swift is the ultimate form of purchasing the same item in multiple formats. In addition to the CDs and, yes, the vinyl, you have to buy the Taylor’s version of all the albums she’s redone, even if you bought the original album before she re-recorded them. And you’re expected to buy the albums she hasn’t re-recorded yet, preferably in multiple formats, with the knowledge that you will be buying them again when she re-records her own versions in another year or two. But only if she stays with Travis Kelce, because if they break up, she’ll write new music and not need to release another “Taylor’s version.”

Oh, and send some Spotify fees her way, too. 

So Daughter saved up her allowance for a few months to purchase a record player. Then she wanted to buy some vinyl. 

I was sorta game, because, call me old, but sometimes I miss listening to albums as they were intended. I get tired of telling Alexa or Pandora to play some Beatles only to find they don’t know that the second half of Abbey Road is supposed to be played continuously. Nothing’s more jarring than “She Came in Through the Bathroom Window” being in between “Please, Please Me” and “Here, There, and Everywhere.”

Daughter started with three Taylor Swift albums and I threw a couple Lake Street Dive albums because the whole family likes them, even though we mostly listen to them on Alexa. Haven’t been able to find Abbey Road yet, which is probably a good thing. It’s one thing to buy an album you already have on newer, better technology. It’s quite another to intentionally retrograde your version. 

The pricing of these records was where my belief in supply and demand totally shit the fan. There is no earthly reason they should cost twice, even three times, as much as CDs. At Barnes & Noble, the CD version of Taylor Swift’s Red was $18 or $19 and the vinyl was $45! And that’s Taylor’s version, where she’s getting 100% of the proceeds.

Back in the early 1990s, when they were brand new, CDs cost $15-20, while cassettes ran about $10 and vinyl was maybe a little less, because nobody was buying them. 

I remember being at a concert where the artist said CDs and cassettes cost the same amount to produce. The audience gasped. That artist, and others, were hoping to bring the price of CDs down. Instead, the industry responded by increasing the price of cassettes. That pretty much killed off cassettes, because, back before social media, people weren’t willing to pay more for worse technology.

They should’ve quadrupled the price. Then called cassettes “niche.”

Or waited a decade and used the term “vintage.”

Somehow CDs still cost about $15. Evidently they’ve never heard of inflation. Neither have video games. When I was buying piece-of-shit 8-bit games for my Intellivision or original NES, they set me back about $50. With a few exceptions, video games for a PS4 or PS5 stay mostly in that $40-50 range. The difference is that I only made $3.35 an hour back in the NES days, so I’d have to pretty much work a whole week to afford a video game. Now it’ll take me an hour. The same hour I just spent writing this blog while my students watched WarGames.

By that rationale, I could get four or five CDs an hour. But I don’t. I think I’ve purchased maybe ten CDs in the last ten years. Because even when I buy them, I just listen to their contents online, which doesn’t necessitate having the physical CD in my possession, not to mention finding something to play it on. My new car doesn’t even have a CD player anymore. 

As a result there are fewer CD shops. And fewer CD player shops. Seriously, how the hell is Best Buy still in business?

That’s called a decrease in demand. Fewer people purchase a product, fewer of the product are produced, and the price drops. Or, in this case, the price stays the same despite thirty years of inflation. 

That memo that hasn’t hit vinyl. Oh, the quantity available has certainly dropped, which makes it annoying to look for anything other than Taylor Swift, a couple of country stars, and maybe Led Zeppelin. Seriously, the Barnes and Noble had about ten copies of various Zeppelin records. Of all the questions I have about today’s vinyl customers, I really, really, really want to know who is just now, in 2024, desiring to purchase Zeppelin IV on vinyl.

For $30.

I know, I know. I sound like a broken record here.  

But hey, at least Millennials and Gen Zs will finally know what it means to sound like a broken record. My students always thought it was a good thing, referring to broken records in sports. But it’s a Michael Jackson reference, not a Michael Jordan reference. Not that they know who either of those people are. Sorry, I sound like a Taylor Swift broken record, not a Travis Kelce broken record.

Since we purchased the record player and records, wanna know Daughter’s preferred way to listen to Taylor Swift? On Alexa. Or YouTube. They’re so much more convenient.

And what is the record player doing? Sitting there on the shelf gathering dust, just like it was 1986 up in this bitch.

So sure, people, convince yourself that those cracks and hisses are “essential to the music” and pay a premium for it. 

Then go listen to it digitally.

Because you know what I’ve never heard anybody say when leaving a concert?

Damn! Why no crackles?

2020 Virtual Concert Review

Last week I wrote about the two aborted concerts that I hoped to attend in 2020. One was from Billy Joel, a tried-and-true entertainer I saw once before when I was in college. The other was Vampire Weekend, a band I wasn’t even aware of a year ago. For obvious reasons, neither concert happened.

But 2020 wasn’t completely devoid of live music. As long as you were willing to watch it on a screen.

So although I didn’t see the two concerts I intended to see, I did manage to watch two concerts in their entirety. Again, one featured old performers that I’ve already been throwing money at for decades, while the other came from a newish band that I’ve always been curious about seeing live.

Preservation Hall. 

I couldn’t make it to New Orleans to watch Vampire Weekend, but at least I could watch a streamed version of a concert for the New Orleans Jazz Preservation Hall. Or maybe it was on PBS. I can’t remember.

Seeing as New Orleans is one of my favorite cities to visit, I’ve watched a few concerts at Preservation Hall. It’s fun to stop in on an afternoon jaunt down Bourbon Street to hear jazz combos similar to my high school jazz band That’s not knock. My high school jazz band was pretty kick-ass. I love me some saxophone, trumpet, and trombone combos. Play me a simplified arrangement of a Count Basie tune, and I’ll happily put off my next hand grenade for twenty minutes or so.

At least I thought it was Preservation Hall I’d frequented on those trips down Bourbon. But now that I looked it up on Google Maps, it might actually be Maison Bourbon, a half-block away from the actual Preservation Hall. Oops.

Regardless, I was happy when they had a benefit concert online, with some really big names. I’m talking Dave Matthews, Elvis Costello, Paul McCartney. Unfortunately, it was in typical telethon fashion, where they wasted twenty minutes in between each song with interviews and “call in now” and shit. At least I could pause and skip ahead, something my grandparents could’ve only dreamed of back in the Jerry Lewis Labor Day snoozefests. 

Those big-name benefit songs had a very, very pre-recorded feel to them. There were a few, like Dave Grohl and Nathaniel Rateliff, who seemed to take it more seriously, picking their jazzier numbers and talking about the importance of either live music or of preserving olde tyme music. Others seemed to send in whatever promo song they had recorded for charity write-offs. I was looking forward to Elvis Costello and was disappointed when he just played some “songs off his newest album,” aka the part of the concert containing the Great Restroom Exodus.

Everybody on the comment box was pining away for McCartney. Where’s Paul? When will Paul be here? Clearly they haven’t sat through proper telethons. It was obvious he was going to be last, and it was obvious to be as non-specifically for Preservation Hall as it gets. He might’ve done “Hey, Jude.” I don’t remember. And he might or might not have looked two decades younger. At least Elvis had the decency to half-ass a newer song so we knew it was recorded this decade. 

I ended up liking the actual jazz band, who played an occasional song in between the big acts, better than the names that brought me there in the first place. Even so, I didn’t donate. 

I’ll drop some money at Maison Bourbon next time I’m in NOLA and we’ll call it good.

Nathaniel Rateliff. 

Later in the pandemic, Red Rocks in Colorado did an online fundraising concert, as well. Again, a place I’ve been to and enjoyed. And a band I like, as well. Tune me in.

And this was legitimately live. They were literally playing on the stage in front of an empty Red Rocks Amphitheater. You could switch cameras to watch the rocks instead, something I found myself doing when I went there, too. Although I didn’t have to switch cams then, I only had to pivot my neck.

Nathaniel Rateliff has been on my short list for some time. He wasn’t some unknown to top ten skyrocket like those Vampire Weekend upstarts. 

Of course, my first introduction to him was “S.O.B.,” the best drinking song this side of “Tubthumping.” Although neither of those songs should be considered happy drinking song. Maybe thinking enough about booze to want to write a song about it predicates a certain bipolar dependency. But then just when you’re about to commiserate with the artist, right there on the precipice of singing the blues, they bang the door down with a grandiose “fuck it, let’s get blotto.”

With a first song like that, one could understand my hesitation against full-throated bandwagon-jumping. If your initial hit is reminiscent of “Tubthumping,” you’ve gotta worry about being the next Chumbawumba. And how many other Chumbawumba songs have you ever heard? Unfortunately, I’ve heard others, and they need a drink. Holy crap, that’s a bad album.

At least Rateliff seemed to have some musical talent going for him, which was always missing from even the acceptable Chumbawumba song. Something similar could be said about Fun., which you must properly pronounce as “Fun period,” another band with a song that, at first, sounds like a fun (period) song about hanging out with your friends at the bar, something I did the majority of my twenties (and thirties). But on closer listen, it’s closer to a creepy “Every Breath You Take,” with the dude hoping to swoop in on an ex (whom he beat) when she’s drunk at the end of the night. At least Fun. had some good musical talent, but it was all based on something approaching ten-part harmony. Rateliff gets there by himself. With apologies to the Night Sweats.

But still, if you take one look at him, you don’t think rockstar. Or at least not young, eager, carpe-diem rock star. In his first music video, he looked like someone who’s been touring for forty years. Tore up from the floor up. Rode hard and put away wet. Whatever phrase you wanna use, he was no Justin Timberlake.

So somewhat gimmicky song about drinking and looking like he might be dead by the end of the week. I spent most of the last decade on the fringes of fandom. Perhaps appreciation would be the best descriptor. I heard some of his other songs and they all showed promise. What I was waiting for was the staying power. It’s so much easier when the band already has four full albums before I discover them.

Similar to Vampire Weekend, Nathaniel Rateliff’s most recent album (actually his third album, not his second as I originally believed) came out shortly before the pandemic, so I was able to hear the songs as they received copious amounts of radio play. I enjoyed “Baby It’s Alright.” Very bluesy. A ballad. Some vibrato in the voice. Polar opposite of “SOB,” although not really, because you’ve still got the mournful voice, the hurt. There’s a lot lying there underneath the surface. This was no Chumbawumba. This wasn’t even a repeat of Fun. (Am I supposed to put another period if Fun. is at the end of a sentence?).

The final hurdle I needed to pass (aside from buying his albums because that’s what YouTube is for) was to see him live. He definitely seemed to have the vibe of a good live act. I tend to like the acts whose songs are equal parts emotion and talent. Those tend to make the best shows as opposed to, say, a band that’s more concerned with choreography or pyrotechnics. In all honesty, I’m a little worried my current fascination with Vampire Weekend might wane after seeing them live. They seem a wee bit aloof, a sconce “we wrote good songs, so we don’t need to put any emphasis into it. Sing along if you must.”

So the last thing I needed to become a proper Nathaniel Rateliff fan, to finally determine if he’s talent or hack, was to see him live. And if I can see him for free, all the better. 

Oops, was I supposed to donate to Red Rocks while watching the free concert?

And yeah, the dude is solid. He feels every song. He emotes. And he’s no slouch on the guitar, either. I could see him being the kind of guy who would play for three or four hours if the crowd and venue allowed it. With “S.O.B.” it’s clear he’s got some inner demons. It feels like the stage is where he exorcizes them, and he’s all too aware of it.

One oddity was that he appeared to be playing through his entire new album, track by track. I tuned in late, so I don’t know if this was explained or if the first half of the concert was some old stuff. So he never played “S.O.B.”

I bet a lot of artists wish they could do that. After all, the new songs are the ones that mean the most to them. It’s our fault that they keep having to bust out “Freebird.” If we aren’t in the crowd then we can go fuck ourselves if we’re only tuning in for his one hit six years ago.

The weirdest part of the whole concert was that he DIDN’T come out for an encore. What the fuck? Were we not cheering loudly enough at our homes thousands of miles away? What do you want us to do? Pay to get you to…

Oh…

Oh, I think I get it now.

My bad.

Messiah Holding on Line Three

So, Jesus’s best friend was a rabbit that fucked a chicken, right?

‘Tis the season when an organization that promotes celibacy usurps a bunch of springtime fertility symbols. Just keep your peep shows to the marshmallow type, buster.

As I mentioned during Saturnalia (what the pleebs refer to as Christmas), I understand that advertising for Christianity’s got to be a little difficult. Back in the nineties, I was annoyed when those “Got Jesus?” bumper stickers started popping up. I thought it was bush league. Maybe Christianity can’t pay the same as Madison Avenue, but isn’t the cause of all inspiration supposed to play for your team? The best you can do is steal somebody else’s ad campaign?

Well, at least there aren’t any commandments against theft or anything. Moses couldn’t be bothered with intellectual property and copyright law.

But I’m a little older now, which might (Might!) mean I’m a little wiser. I kinda get it now. Advertising for any of the various Christian faiths has got to be tough.

“Think you’re a good person? Come in and find out why not.”

“You’re a sinner! Find out how!”

“Limited time offer: Join during Lent and give up meat on Fridays!”

So I’m a little bit more lenient toward religious advertising these days. But I was still a little taken back when I saw this:

Jesus

This fills me with a lot of questions.

I live and work in a pretty high-Latino area, so my first thought on seeing this sign was to read it in Spanglish: Hay-zeus called.

So my first question is: Is this a landscaping issue?

Or is my student calling me about the homework assignment? And if so, can’t he e-mail me?

I’ve noticed that, in my classroom, Jesus seems to be the only Spanish name that nobody anglicizes. Pablo? “Call me Paul.” Jorge? “It’s pronounced George.”

But I’m still waiting for the first “It’s Gee-zus, not Hay-zeus.”

But with this sign, seeing as it was outside a church,  I assume that the Jesus who is calling is Mr. Christ. But this doesn’t stop the questions.

Actually, the first question is the same, regardless of if it’s the Savior or my student. Why is Jesus calling? Can he not e-mail me instead?

Maybe Jesus was illiterate. It would fit His position in life. Not sure how many carpenters in the conquered territories of the Roman Empire could read or write. Maybe that’s why everybody else had to write down what He said.

Okay, so e-mail is out. Too bad, Jesus. There are some great websites I could’ve directed you to.  (You or you? Do I capitalize You when I’m referring to Him in the second person?)

Okay, so no e-mail. Jesus is calling me on a landline. It’s not even cordless.

Is this a money thing or a technology thing?

I can’t imagine it’s about money. There’s plenty of cash coming in to the Christly coffers on a regular basis. Just ask Tammy Faye Bakker – she was big right around the time Jesus bought that phone. I’m pretty sure Jesus wouldn’t have to pay taxes, either. Partly because He’s a non-profit, but He also seems to have every politician in his pocket. They invoke his name even more than the oil companies and unions, and you know those two groups don’t have to pay for shit.

So it’s about technology. Jesus is opposed to modern contrivances. I guess that makes sense. Idle hands, and all that. Maybe he subscribes to the whole Protestant work ethic. Sorry, Catholics.

But still, this advertisement suggests that  Jesus DOES still own a phone. So some form of instant communication is acceptable. As long as it’s analog.

But when, precisely, did Jesus gave up on technology? If the advertisement had shown the telephone chassis instead of just the receiver, I might be able to decipher if He lost hope in the 1950s or the 1980s. According the the Republicans, those were definitely the last two time Jesus loved America. But which one? Does Jesus strike me as a guy who takes the time for rotary dial? Or has He at least allowed for touch-tone technology?

Regardless, it’s clearly either computer or wireless technology that the Savior has problems with. I don’t know which, but I can maybe make an argument for each. Wireless travels through the ether. Maybe that’s where He lives. It goes back to the whole Copernicus issue. If Earth goes around the sun, then where is heaven? And now we know the answer. Heaven is where radio waves reside. Marconi was the one that killed him, not Galileo.

Or maybe it’s computer technology that He’s opposed to. But, Jesus, if you can get past all the free porn, you’d find your name all over social media. Nobody really gets your message, but trust me, your name is everywhere. You and Chuck Norris have cornered half of the meme market by yourselves.

I know. It’s hard to get past all the free porn. But I think you mentioned something about your right hand causing you to sin during the Sermon on the Mount. Or you might not have. I’m not sure. Most Christians don’t actually pay attention to what you actually said.

So I get that you’re opposed to most modern form of communication.

But the problem with calling on the landline is that it’ll probably just go to voicemail. Nobody answers unknown phone numbers anymore. If you really want to get ahold of me, maybe try texting instead of calling. I know that brings up the whole literacy thing again, but honestly, you’ve had a couple of centuries to learn. You really only have yourself to blame.

Regardless, I am at least comforted by one fact. If you’re still using a landline, you won’t know about call waiting yet.

So sorry, Jesus. I heard you were trying to call me, but I must’ve been on the other line.

God damn that busy signal.